Sonorants are:
In this lab, we are going to explore the acoustic correlates of two types of sonorants: glides [w j] and liquids [ɹ l].
Go to eClass and download the following Lab 5 files. Note, you could also generate these yourself, but I have done it for you here to make sure that the sound files are clear enough for taking measurements.
File name | Words |
---|---|
Lab5_We_You.wav | we, you |
Lab5_Leer_Reel.wav | leer, reel |
A. Formants
TIP: My voice works best with formant tracking set to a ceiling of 5000 Hz, and the rest of the settings at default/standard. Double check these settings each time you open each of the files for this lab.
B. Formant transitions
A. Formants
Certain sounds are pronounced differently in onset vs. coda position, including liquids. For the measurements of formants in this section, you’ll also want to turn on formant tracking (Formants > Show formants).
First consider the onset [ɹ] and [l]. (Think back to your phonology classes: you’ll find the onset [ɹ] in “reel” and the onset [l] in “leer”).
Now, consider the coda [ɹ] and [l].
B. Formant transition shapes
Consider the coda [ɹ] and [l] transition zones:
C. Formant transition durations: Onsets vs. Codas
In this last part, you will compare the duration of liquids across syllabic positions. You may want to turn off formant tracking for this section and instead eyeball the spectrogram’s dark streaks.
Table 5.1 Acoustic correlates of glides
[w] | [j] | |
---|---|---|
Formants (Glides) | F1: | F1: |
F2: | F2: | |
F3: | F3: | |
Formant transitions (Glide-Vowel) as a drawing or a brief description |
Q1: Look at the formant structure of the glides: which vowel does each glide resemble?
Q2: What differences do you note between the two glide-vowel contours, i.e. between the transitions out of the two glides? Articulatorily, what do you think causes these differences, and how are these articulatory differences reflected in the acoustics?
Table 5.2 Acoustic correlates of liquids
[ɹ] | [l] | |
---|---|---|
Formants (Liquids) in onset | F1: | F1: |
F2: | F2: | |
F3: | F3: | |
Formants (Liquids) in coda | F1: | F1: |
F2: | F2: | |
F3: | F3: | |
Formant transitions (vowel-liquid) as a drawing or a brief description | ||
Formant transition duration | Onset: | Onset: |
Coda: | Coda: |
Q3: Which formant is most strikingly different between the two liquids?
Q4: Describe the differences you see between the two vowel-liquid contours, i.e. between the transitions into the two liquids.
Q5: Compare the transition durations in onset vs. coda position (ɹi vs. iɹ and li vs. il): which transitions are longer, onset or coda?
Q6: Think about articulatory differences between /l/ in onset vs. coda position. Given what you know about these differences (think of the allophones of /l/ in English), do you expect any acoustic differences? If so, do your observations match your expectations?
Q7: Provide a reference and very brief summary of one academic paper that uses the methods covered in this lab.
Disclaimer: The original lab materials on which this lab is based was put together in 2015 (updated 2019) by Sonya Bird, Qian Wang, Sky Onosson, and Allison Benner for the LING 380 Acoustic Phonetics course at the University of Victoria. Their materials are released under a Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows for non-commercial use as well as copying and distribution and the creation of derivative works for non-commercial purposes. Thomas Kettig (with assistance from Taylor Potter) has modified these materials as needed for the York University LING 4220 Acoustic Phonetics course.